I guess I always considered that the 3 year rule was for certain brands only. Unfortunately, it seems like Subaru has become one of those brands. They just can't seem to figure out or are unwilling to create effective Quality Control & the testing protocols necessary before putting a new car on the market. Yes, it costs money and requires hiring the appropriate folks. I own an 2018 Outback (which is the 4th year of the vehicles 5 year cycle). The first 3 years of that 5th generation Outback were also full of issues! My vehicle has not been perfect, but it has been very good

But I would love to move up to more room and comfort that an Ascent would provide. I just can't do it, yet. I just don't have the confidence either in the Ascent or Subaru's handling/working out of its issues (the dealers, on the other hand, along with the customer support line seem to be doing a better job on their end though). I looked at the new Toyota Highlander, but gosh, its just so much more expensive than the Ascent - comparing the most equivalent trim levels with adding the AWD option. In the end, I would have to buy a Highlander Base or LE - the bottom two trim levels (of 5 I believe). I would be actually going backwards or stepping down in terms of refinement, comfort & technology? Which makes no sense at all. You just can't beat the Subaru value proposition. BUT, value minus reliability or a car that requires your constant attention due to issues is not a bargain ether? Which is why I no longer drive or consider Land Rovers, Volvos, Volkswagens, Hondas etc. Very frustrating.