Subaru Ascent Forum banner

Fuel economy worse than a big SUV

13327 Views 139 Replies 55 Participants Last post by  lesanek
Hi,

I've never owned a new car but after our Honda Odyssey gave up the ghost with 260k miles we splurged on an 2021 Ascent with 1200 miles. It was crazy expensive but everything is these days. Anyhow, I have also been Toyota guy but elected to not get a Sequoia because of the fuel economy and AWD Siennas are not easy to find. Instead we compromised on size for something more efficient (or so we thought).

We have only used the Ascent for running around our small town and the speed limit is 60mph on the hwy. It has was typically getting about 16mpg for our combined town and highway driving. I was pretty disappointed but thought we do so many short trips it wasn't probably too unreasonable.

We took our first road trip over Christmas break from Idaho to southern Utah. We have 4 kids so I had the roof top carrier on. I calculated the mileage for the whole trip and got as bad as 9mpg on a tank and as high as 14mpg. Overall, we averaged about 12mpg. I am extremely disappointed! I called two Subaru dealers to ask them if they had seen this before and they both said that they had not nor did they every hear of a service bulletin for the issue.

Its a nice car to drive around town in but man, what a gutless pig on the open road. After about 2 hours on the interstate I almost considered turning around and loading up in the F250 diesel work truck as it gets about 18 mpg on the open highway at 80mph. I felt like the Ascent just couldn't hold speed very well and was straining all the time if there was any grade. I ended up setting the cruise at 70 even though the speed limit was 80.

My thoughts are Subaru undersized the engine for the application? It's actually not up to the task of hauling 6 passengers and luggage on a road trip. Keep in mind we are a family with little kids so it wasn't terribly heavy. I tried everything from manually shifting for a few tanks to reducing speed and drafting a semi. Overall I'd say besides my old 1993 land cruiser, it was the worst vehicle I have ever driven on the interstate for performance and fuel economy. Oh how I missed the ratty old Honda mini van. It would do 90mph if you weren't careful and pull 20mpg.

I'm either super unlucky or somebody else has to be experiencing this too. I think I'm going to trade it off even though I will be taking a big hit.
See less See more
  • Haha
  • Wow
  • Helpful
Reactions: 3
81 - 100 of 140 Posts
Hi,

I've never owned a new car but after our Honda Odyssey gave up the ghost with 260k miles we splurged on an 2021 Ascent with 1200 miles. It was crazy expensive but everything is these days. Anyhow, I have also been Toyota guy but elected to not get a Sequoia because of the fuel economy and AWD Siennas are not easy to find. Instead we compromised on size for something more efficient (or so we thought).

We have only used the Ascent for running around our small town and the speed limit is 60mph on the hwy. It has was typically getting about 16mpg for our combined town and highway driving. I was pretty disappointed but thought we do so many short trips it wasn't probably too unreasonable.

We took our first road trip over Christmas break from Idaho to southern Utah. We have 4 kids so I had the roof top carrier on. I calculated the mileage for the whole trip and got as bad as 9mpg on a tank and as high as 14mpg. Overall, we averaged about 12mpg. I am extremely disappointed! I called two Subaru dealers to ask them if they had seen this before and they both said that they had not nor did they every hear of a service bulletin for the issue.

Its a nice car to drive around town in but man, what a gutless pig on the open road. After about 2 hours on the interstate I almost considered turning around and loading up in the F250 diesel work truck as it gets about 18 mpg on the open highway at 80mph. I felt like the Ascent just couldn't hold speed very well and was straining all the time if there was any grade. I ended up setting the cruise at 70 even though the speed limit was 80.

My thoughts are Subaru undersized the engine for the application? It's actually not up to the task of hauling 6 passengers and luggage on a road trip. Keep in mind we are a family with little kids so it wasn't terribly heavy. I tried everything from manually shifting for a few tanks to reducing speed and drafting a semi. Overall I'd say besides my old 1993 land cruiser, it was the worst vehicle I have ever driven on the interstate for performance and fuel economy. Oh how I missed the ratty old Honda mini van. It would do 90mph if you weren't careful and pull 20mpg.

I'm either super unlucky or somebody else has to be experiencing this too. I think I'm going to trade it off even though I will be taking a big hit.
So I've had this same problem with the MPG. I haven't got a chance to look at the replies but in my case we were at around 19 MPG. People in here were saying that they get close to 26. After some digging and talking to a buddy in Subaru, some of the Ascents from factory don't have the right tune for a SUV. Some people were saying factory had a recall and they reflashed the ECU and that fixed the high revs with causes the bad MPG. Dealer would not work with us. So bite the bullet and got the Cobb accessport and reflash a stage 1 - 87 oct tune(Cuz why not have a little fun). MPG actually went up to about 24 (when im not pedal to the metal lol). Going to drive a little more with stage 1 w/87 oct tune for a little more that try the stage 1 93 tune. After all that might try the ECO tune but if I can stay around 24 to 26 with the stage 1 tunes ill leave it. Rather have the power and not need that need it and not have it.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
After some digging and talking to a buddy in Subaru, some of the Ascents from factory don't have the right tune for a SUV.
Nope, sorry, but that isn't accurate. Each series of Subaru Ascents runs the same tune, and they're all the right one.

Some people were saying factory had a recall and they reflashed the ECU and that fixed the high revs with causes the bad MPG.
Nope, sorry, that's not correct. There's never been any such recall for the Ascent. The ECU recall had nothing to do with that. I went into detail about it here:

got the Cobb accessport and reflash a stage 1 - 87 oct tune(Cuz why not have a little fun). MPG actually went up to about 24 (when im not pedal to the metal lol).
That's indicative of poor throttle management on your part. It's a touchy throttle, for sure. The tune smooths the throttle response making it easier to use for those who haven't learned it. On the 87 Eco tune, you should be able to hit 30 mpg at below 65 or 70 mph highway.

You may find this helpful:
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Nope, sorry, but that isn't accurate. Each series of Subaru Ascents runs the same tune, and they're all the right one.


Nope, sorry, that's not correct. There's never been any such recall for the Ascent. The ECU recall had nothing to do with that. I went into detail about it here:


That's indicative of poor throttle management on your part. It's a touchy throttle, for sure. The tune smooths the throttle response making it easier to use for those who haven't learned it. On the 87 Eco tune, you should be able to hit 30 mpg at below 65 or 70 mph highway.

You may find this helpful:

Oh ok thanks for the info. As far as the info about the recall, that is what was told to me.. But more that one person said they took the car to the dealer reflashed the ECU and that helped with the MPG....If i can get 30 with the ECO that would be great but ill settle with the stage 1 if i keep getting above 24.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Oh ok thanks for the info. As far as the info about the recall, that is what was told to me.. But more that one person said they took the car to the dealer reflashed the ECU and that helped with the MPG....If i can get 30 with the ECO that would be great but ill settle with the stage 1 if i keep getting above 24.
I am pretty sure they meant reset the ECU - which just wipes the learning values and restarts it learning again. That just wipes the driver's initial bad habits. A few hundred or a thousand more miles would mostly do the same thing.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
The 2023 Toyota Sequoia with the new Hybrid Turbo V6 powerplant is rated at 20 mpg combined. One reviewer on YouTube said he only got 10 mpg combined. That is abysmal. It makes the Ascent look like a gas sipper in comparison.
  • Wow
Reactions: 1
The 2023 Toyota Sequoia with the new Hybrid Turbo V6 powerplant is rated at 20 mpg combined. One reviewer on YouTube said he only got 10 mpg combined. That is abysmal. It makes the Ascent look like a gas sipper in comparison.
At around $70-80K it's in the Big Leagues with the Suburban and Excursion. It's advertised as ''On Demand 4WD", not a true AWD system.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I put the cruise setting in eco mode, keep the throttle angle below 25% let the cvt do the shifting and run around 72 mph and get 26 to 27. It is really that easy. If it is doing as poorly as you have documented the dealers a service department should find a problem very quickly. If not p!ease try the things I have outlined above it sure bumped my mileage, just not as much fun as making the turbo howl! That unfortunately as of late has become a very expensive carnival ride! Lol!
  • Like
Reactions: 4
Just bought my 1st Subaru about 9 days ago. I love it, but I'm on my 3rd tank of gas and I'm averaging 11.8 mpg according to my stock '23 Ascent Touring. I'm hoping this gets better after the break-in period, but idk. I have a heavy foot. I'm a spirited driver. I don't plan on changing that, but I still didn't expect to be under 12mpg and not pulling some sort of heavy trailer. Am I wrong to expect better mileage? I average about 70-90mph on the expressway, and have a mixed 22 min commute, which is about 50/50 city/expressway. Will this get better or is it just my driving?
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Just bought my 1st Subaru about 9 days ago. I love it, but I'm on my 3rd tank of gas and I'm averaging 11.8 mpg according to my stock '23 Ascent Touring. I'm hoping this gets better after the break-in period, but idk. I have a heavy foot. I'm a spirited driver. I don't plan on changing that, but I still didn't expect to be under 12mpg and not pulling some sort of heavy trailer. Am I wrong to expect better mileage? I average about 70-90mph on the expressway, and have a mixed 22 min commute, which is about 50/50 city/expressway. Will this get better or is it just my driving?

Welcome!

My mileage began to steadily improve after 5K miles of break-in, but never as poor as what you are reporting. It is tempting to get into the "Turbo Zone", but as they say... "If you wanna play, you gotta pay" (at the gas pump). At 12k miles, and driving easy, I am averaging ~18 in town, and ~27 highway.
Just bought my 1st Subaru about 9 days ago. I love it, but I'm on my 3rd tank of gas and I'm averaging 11.8 mpg according to my stock '23 Ascent Touring. I'm hoping this gets better after the break-in period, but idk. I have a heavy foot. I'm a spirited driver. I don't plan on changing that, but I still didn't expect to be under 12mpg and not pulling some sort of heavy trailer. Am I wrong to expect better mileage? I average about 70-90mph on the expressway, and have a mixed 22 min commute, which is about 50/50 city/expressway. Will this get better or is it just my driving?
Use your instant mpg meter cruising at 60, 65, 70, etc. If you see instant readings starting in the high to mid 20's mpgs dropping with each increment, you are getting appropriate readings. Everything else (substantially lower average readings) are a byproduct of heavy foot, excessive speed, multiple cold starts, lengthy warmups, etc, etc.
I have a heavy foot. I'm a spirited driver. I don't plan on changing that, but I still didn't expect to be under 12mpg and not pulling some sort of heavy trailer. Am I wrong to expect better mileage? I average about 70-90mph on the expressway, and have a mixed 22 min commute, which is about 50/50 city/expressway. Will this get better or is it just my driving?
Your stated driving style...and speed...are absolutely going to negatively affect your fuel economy and even more so with a turbo that spools up the way the Ascent's does. When you get up above 70 mph and beyond, you're pushing what is effectively a two and a quarter ton brick on wheels through the air. The air is going to win every time.
Your stated driving style...and speed...are absolutely going to negatively affect your fuel economy and even more so with a turbo that spools up the way the Ascent's does. When you get up above 70 mph and beyond, you're pushing what is effectively a two and a quarter ton brick on wheels through the air. The air is going to win every time.
I get all that. I just expected numbers closer to the bottom of the EPA city numbers, not towing an Airstream uphill into the wind type of numbers. I'm hoping that after break-in things will get better, but maybe not with my driving style. I guess time will tell. I do love spooling up that turbo.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
4
I get all that. I just expected numbers closer to the bottom of the EPA city numbers, not towing an Airstream uphill into the wind type of numbers. I'm hoping that after break-in things will get better, but maybe not with my driving style. I guess time will tell. I do love spooling up that turbo.

EPA "city" has zero to do with what big-city people would call city driving. It's more in line with the suburbs of a big city. People who live in NYC Metro, LA, San Fran, Dallas, etc, will virtually never see that gas mileage. Hitting those speed peaks in NYC is illegal everywhere except the highways (the two high peaks are illegal even there).
Slope Rectangle Font Plot Line



Heck, what most people don't know is that there's a specific NYC schedule, because of that. It's quite different.
Slope Font Rectangle Parallel Plot



There's tons of other schedules as well, but, generally, the published tests are "city" (which is more like suburbs) and "highway" (which is 60 mph or below).
Rectangle Azure Plot Slope Organism



Here's the "high speed" tests which aren't published, but far more accurate to how people drive - VERY different than the test used by the EPA for the ratings, sadly.
Rectangle Slope Azure Plot Font



Regardless, on our turbopowered Ascents, stop and go with a heavy foot obliterates gas mileage because of making the turbo spool up repeatedly.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3

EPA "city" has zero to do with what big-city people would call city driving. It's more in line with the suburbs of a big city. People who live in NYC Metro, LA, San Fran, Dallas, etc, will virtually never see that gas mileage. Hitting those speed peaks in NYC is illegal everywhere except the highways (the two high peaks are illegal even there).
View attachment 20352


Heck, what most people don't know is that there's a specific NYC schedule, because of that. It's quite different.
View attachment 20349


There's tons of other schedules as well, but, generally, the published tests are "city" (which is more like suburbs) and "highway" (which is 60 mph or below).
View attachment 20351


Here's the "high speed" tests which aren't published, but far more accurate to how people drive - VERY different than the test used by the EPA for the ratings, sadly.
View attachment 20350


Regardless, on our turbopowered Ascents, stop and go with a heavy foot obliterates gas mileage because of making the turbo spool up repeatedly.
Many ppl don't realize that EPA tests are basically done "in a test tube".... indoors on a dyno in climate controlled conditions at the same relative elevation. That's the only fair way to compare one car to another, using the exact same test under the exact same conditions, eliminating variables like wind, hills, temps, elevation, traffic conditions, etc.
  • Love
Reactions: 1
That's the only fair way to compare one car to another, using the exact same test under the exact same conditions, eliminating variables like wind, hills, temps, elevation, traffic conditions, etc.
...which is the only thing that the EPA numbers are valid for. It even says that in the "fine print" on the sticker, but a lot of folks only see the numbers and don't read the rest.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
...which is the only thing that the EPA numbers are valid for. It even says that in the "fine print" on the sticker, but a lot of folks only see the numbers and don't read the rest.
I forgot to add "Driving style", probably the greatest variable. I occasionally can't resist stepping on the go pedal, but when I do the MPG bar buries itself in the red! :oops:
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I occasionally have that problem too... but only occasionally, like 95% of the time of late. 😞

The upside is I am getting to know the people who work at the gas station near me. 🤪
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I occasionally have that problem too... but only occasionally, like 95% of the time of late. 😞

The upside is I am getting to know the people who work at the gas station near me. 🤪
Years ago I had a friend with a Chevy 409 and a 3-speed column shift with a crazy low axle ratio. He said "I don't need a tach, I start in first gear with the tank full, shift to second at 3/4, and then to high at half tank. I can pass anything on the road except a gas station".
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
I accept the EPA numbers for what they are, but if I drive the same way in different cars then the corresponding mpg is relative to them all. The Ascent has a harder time hitting the numbers than other cars we've had and still have. It's also something I worry little about.

Right now, with nothing but mostly short runs around town we're in 12-14 mpg range. We might only go through 4 - 5 tanks for the winter
  • Like
Reactions: 1
81 - 100 of 140 Posts
Top